薄层状岩石声发射定位群智能和单纯形方法对比研究

Comparative study of swarm intelligence and simplex shape algorithm for acoustic emission localization in thin-layered rocks

  • 摘要: 薄层状岩石作为深部地下工程中常见的岩石类型,在深部高地应力环境下的破裂失稳是诱发围岩大变形、岩爆等重大工程灾害的关键因素,严重威胁工程施工与运营安全。开展薄层状岩石破裂失稳机理研究的前提在于对其内部微破裂萌生与扩展位置实现精准的空间定位。以炭质板岩、石英云母片岩、石英片岩及黑色页岩4种典型薄层状岩石为研究对象,基于薄层状岩石层理面主导的各向异性,通过函数拟合方法建立了薄层状岩石各向异性波速模型,通过数值试验系统对比了各向异性波速模型与均一波速模型的定位精度,并结合该各向异性波速模型构建了基于不同群智能算法及单纯形法的声发射定位方法,探究了不同算法针对不同波速条件岩石的声发射定位性能差异,并利用真三轴压缩试验对优选算法进行实际验证,综合得到了不同岩石条件下的算法选型。结果表明:在声发射定位波速模型中,应用各向异性波速模型的定位精度显著优于普通均一波速模型;声发射定位算法数值试验对比中,群智能算法的定位效果受试样整体波速量值影响较小,稳定性较好,而单纯形算法的定位效果与波速密切相关,在高波速岩石中定位精度较高,在低波速岩石中误差相对较大;以真三轴试验岩石宏观破裂形态为参照,单纯形算法与自适应粒子群算法对薄层状岩石破裂源具有较高的定位精度与较好的适用性。

     

    Abstract: Thin-layered rocks, a common rock type in deep underground engineering, exhibit fracturing and instability under high stress conditions at great depths. This phenomenon is a key factor triggering major engineering hazards such as large rock mass deformation and rockbursts, posing severe threats to construction and operational safety. Research into the fracture instability mechanism of thin-layered rocks requires precise spatial localization of microfracture initiation and propagation within them. Taking four typical thin-layered rocks — carbonaceous slate, quartz-mica schist, quartz schist, and black shale — as study subjects, an anisotropic wave velocity model was established using function fitting methods based on the anisotropy dominated by bedding planes in thin-layered rocks. Numerical experiments systematically compared the localization accuracy of anisotropic wave velocity models versus uniform wave velocity models. Based on this anisotropic wave velocity model, acoustic emission localization methods were developed using different swarm intelligence algorithms and the simplex method. The performance differences of these algorithms for acoustic emission localization in rocks with varying wave velocity conditions were investigated. The optimized algorithms were validated through true triaxial compression tests, leading to comprehensive recommendations for algorithm selection under different rock conditions. The results show that: In acoustic emission localization wave velocity models, the anisotropic wave velocity model demonstrates significantly superior localization accuracy compared to the uniform wave velocity model. In numerical comparisons of acoustic emission localization algorithms, swarm intelligence algorithms demonstrated less sensitivity to overall sample wave velocity values and higher stability, whereas the simplex algorithm’s performance was closely tied to wave velocity — exhibiting higher accuracy in high-velocity rocks but relatively larger errors in low-velocity rocks. Using the macroscopic fracture morphology from triaxial tests as a reference, both the simplicial algorithm and adaptive particle swarm algorithm demonstrate high localization accuracy and good applicability for locating fracture sources in thin-layered rocks.

     

/

返回文章
返回