燃煤耦合生物质发电磨煤机运行策略优化

Optimization of coal mill operating strategy for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power units

  • 摘要: 为应对日益严峻的能源形势和环保压力,燃煤机组耦合生物质发电技术作为一种可行的减排措施受到广泛关注。针对燃煤机组向生物质耦合机组转型的核心环节——制粉系统的变化,尤其是磨煤机配置及运行策略的优化调整问题,以适应煤粉与生物质的协同燃烧并降低综合发电成本,基于此建立了经济性优化模型。该模型以发电成本最小化为目标,对改造后机组在全混烧、专烧协同及灵活混烧3种典型运行模式进行了对比分析。通过商业求解器Gurobi对构建的混合整数非线性模型进行求解,得到不同负荷要求下不同模式的最优燃料量分配方案,明确了各磨煤机的最优出力和启停时机。与未耦合的纯煤燃烧模式相比,在典型日负荷条件下,不同耦合运行模式下优化后的给料方案均能降低发电成本和碳排放,其中在典型日内全混烧模式分别降低了0.6%和7.0%,专烧协同模式分别降低了1.0%和12.6%,灵活混烧模式分别降低了1.1%和14.4%。结果表明:灵活混烧模式能够有效克服另外2种模式在生物质耦合比例上的固有局限性,展现出更优的运行灵活性、经济效益和碳减排潜力。此外,还简化了磨煤机操作流程,并验证了求解方法的有效性。最后,通过对关键影响因素(燃料价格、生物质热值、生物质供应量)的案例分析,揭示了这些因素对耦合发电经济性和最优运行模式选择的影响。

     

    Abstract: To address the increasingly severe energy situation and environmental pressure, biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants has garnered significant attention as a viable emission reduction measure. Attention was focused on the changes in the pulverizing system, a key aspect of retrofitting coal-fired units for biomass co-firing, and in particular on the optimization of coal mill configuration and operating strategies, so that efficient co-combustion of pulverized coal and biomass could be achieved and the overall generation cost reduced. Accordingly, an economic optimization model was developed. The model, aiming to minimize power generation costs, conducts a comparative analysis of the retrofitted unit under three typical operating modes: full co-firing, dedicated co-firing, and flexible co-firing. The formulated mixed-integer nonlinear programming model was solved using the commercial solver Gurobi to obtain optimal fuel allocation schemes for different modes under varying load demands, and to determine the optimal output and start-stop timing for each pulverizer. Compared to the pure coal combustion mode (without co-firing), under typical daily load conditions, the optimized feeding schemes for the different co-firing modes reduced both power generation costs and carbon emissions: the full co-firing mode by 0.6% and 7.0%, respectively; the dedicated co-firing mode by 1.0% and 12.6%, respectively; and the flexible co-firing mode by 1.1% and 14.4%, respectively. The results indicate that the flexible co-firing mode effectively overcomes the inherent limitations of the other two modes concerning biomass co-firing ratios, demonstrating superior operational flexibility, economic benefits, and carbon emission reduction potential. Furthermore, the study simplified pulverizer operation and validated the effectiveness of the solution algorithm. Finally, case studies on key influencing factors (fuel prices, biomass calorific value, biomass supply) revealed their impact on the economics of co-firing and the selection of optimal operating modes.

     

/

返回文章
返回